Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant and C entered into an agreement that: (a) around June 25, 201, the Defendant and C entered into a couple; (b) the entire business of the “E dan” operated by Ilyang-dong building No. 302 in the Goyang-gu building D on the same day; and (c) the Defendant A entered into an agreement to pay KRW 50 million,00,000,000 in the intermediate payment as of August 15, 201; and (d) the remainder on December 31, 201, to pay KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000 in the intermediate payment as of December 31, 201.
After that, while the victim received and operated the above dan 3 and the singing practice hall from the defendant and C, the defendant and C were unable to pay the above acceptance amount in full, and the mediation was concluded on April 4, 2013 in the case of the claim for transfer of rights by the defendant and C brought to the High Government District Court for the defendant and C, which was brought to the defendant and C to pay KRW 30 million by April 30, 2013, and the victim shall pay KRW 20 million by May 31, 2013.
Since then, although the defendant and C received the payment of the unpaid amount of KRW 50 million from the injured party by means of collection, etc. in accordance with the above mediation result, the defendant and C had a certificate of cash custody prepared around July 9, 2012 in the meaning of the promise of payment of the transfer of rights, they had a document of cash custody prepared around July 9, 2012, and they had the intent to acquire the money by filing a separate lawsuit for the loan claim.
1. The Defendant modified private documents in collusion with C on July 9, 2012, under the title “the certificate of cash custody” of G on the paper A4 at the E dan 302 E Ga-dong, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City on July 9, 2012, 50 million won;
1. I, on July 9, 2012, borrow and keep the above amount from C at the following location:
2. The above amount is confirmed to have not raised any objection even by a civil or criminal accusation against a criminal act committed by a person who agreed to repay the money to the payer by September 30, 2012, and by signing and affixing seals on this deed.