The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the penalty (fine 3,000,000) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant made a confession of all crimes and reflects his mistake, and that the defendant does not have any previous error is favorable to the defendant.

However, in order to maintain public order and establish the rule of law, punishment is required for acts that interfere with legitimate execution of official duties. Thus, the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be less severe than that of the crime of this case, which was committed by the defendant, who was in dispute over E and apartment management expenses, sent to the police officer G by putting him in uniform to arbitration, is not presented, there is no particular circumstance to change the punishment of the court below in the trial court, and all the sentencing conditions in the arguments, such as the character and conduct of the defendant, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime, are considered to be too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.