All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: Defendant A and Defendant B are friendly to the establishment of a high school.

Defendant

At around 04:50 on April 8, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim B by drinking on the ground that the attitude of the victim B, who was a senior high school-friendly patient, was bad, even though he tried to reach a compromise before the high school-friendly party C 5th class D music, but the attitude of the victim B personneled, was 3 to 4 times the inside part of the victim.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place under the above Paragraph (1) of the same Article, assaulted the victim A when he was aware of a drinking house, against this, and assaulted the victim A at a price of 3 to 4 times as a drinking house.

On the other hand, the Defendant continuously assaulted the victim E who fights and fights, and assaulted the victim E at a price of 2 to 3 times.

2. Each of the facts charged against the Defendants may not be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, as a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, since the victims submitted documents including their intent not to punish under mutual agreement after the prosecution of this case was instituted to this court, all of the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.