logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.10.31 2013고단2292
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 01:00 on February 12, 2013, at the defendant's house located in Ansan-si, a member C building 16.16.9 dong 901, and the defendant's house in Ansan-si, a de facto marriage victim D (the 40 years of age, 40) and the reason for divorce during drinking. The defendant had a dispute over the reason for the divorce, and the victim was her son's son, and the victim her son son son son knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site photographs, relevant photographs, and investigation reports;

1. Application of statutes to inquiries about criminal records, etc.;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 53 and Article 55 (1) appears to have committed the instant crime in a state of discretionary mitigation, and considering all circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant has repented

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the suspended execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that there are circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the nature of the crime and the result, etc. of the crime in this case; however, there are no criminal records of the crime in this case and of the suspension of execution, and there are no criminal records of the crime in this case and of the crime in this case, and the defendant was agreed with the victim, and the defendant committed the crime in this case in his state of exploitation, and the defendant appears to have committed the crime in this case contingently. The defendant is in depth divided into his mistake, his social ties is clear, and the detention of the defendant entails excessive difficulty for his dependants; the motive

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;

arrow