The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the lower court sentenced the Defendant (two years of imprisonment and three years of suspended sentence) is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The instant crime committed was committed by the Defendant in singing the victims who were juveniles, and committed an indecent act by deceiving the victim E’s bucks where the victim E’s bucks and bucks, and the Defendant’s bucks. The Defendant appears to have caused considerable mental shock and sexual humiliation due to the instant crime, and the Defendant’s failure to receive any bucks from the victims are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case from the court of the court below to the court of the court below, and divided his mistake, the degree of tangible force exercised during the crime, and the degree of indecent act against the victims is not serious, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine until now after he was sentenced to a suspended sentence for about 26 years, and there is no record of criminal punishment in the same kind of crime in favor of the defendant.

In addition, the above circumstances and the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case, and the guidelines for sentencing established by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court / [the scope of recommendations] general standards for the crime of indecent act by force (the scope of punishment by force over 13 years) and the two types (voluntary indecent act/special compulsory act such as forced indecent act/accident by relatives, etc. by relatives, shall be included in Type 2, but the upper limit and lower limit of the scope of punishment shall be reduced to 2/3) basic area (the final scope of sentence according to the guidelines for processing multiple crimes without any special sentencing) (one year to 3 years from August 4), and the final scope of sentence according to the guidelines for sentencing pursuant to the guidelines for sentencing established by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court / [the scope of punishment by force over 13 years to 5 years from August 18 to 5 years] are unreasonable.

Therefore, prosecutor's argument is without merit.