beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, for one year and six months, for Defendant C, for one year, and for Defendant D.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, B, a person operating a gas station in Gyeyang Incheon Gyeyang-gu, and the defendant C, D, and E are the employees of the above gas station who sold fake and fake diesel through a confidential pipeline connected to the main organic according to the direction of the defendant A and B.
1. Defendants A and B in violation of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act intend to operate a gas station in partnership around July 2012. Defendant A and B are provided with a emulsion receiver to operate a gas station in partnership with the above M station. They installed a emulsion receiver to operate a water source valve device of the oil storage tank to sell fake petroleum through normal organic abandonment. They installed a emulsion receiver to operate a emulative pipe to operate a water source valve of the oil station in the M station office for the purpose of selling fake petroleum through normal organic abandonment. They installed two storage tanks connected with the oil storage tank connected to the oil tank to the oil tank connected to the main organic abandonment. They installed two storage tanks connected with the building by using the emulsion with the oil source so that normal petroleum and fake petroleum can be distributed by enjoying the emulsion.
In addition, the above Defendants, as seen above, employed Defendant C, D, and E as an employee, who had experience in selling fake petroleum as a gas station that can selective oil by manipulating arbials.
around July 2012, Defendants conspired to keep in collusion fake oil mixed with Toluene, etc. in the oil storage tank behind the building and indoor oil mixed with base oil in the oil storage tank. They sell 17,568,743 won of sales price and 64,540,503 won of sales price of fake gasoline and 188,089 square meters of sales price from around that time until around November 14, 2012, Defendant D from around that time until around October 2012, and Defendant E from October 25, 2012 to November 14, 2012, by selling to the principal customer as if he/she was a normal automobile fuel.