1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons why the court of this case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following 2.3 to the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Details to be added; and

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) On March 23, 2016, M succeeded to the Plaintiff’s status as a purchaser of the instant real estate, based on the following: (i) the document confirming the transfer of the instant real estate by M and H from the Defendant; and (ii) M shall remodel the instant real estate for bath purposes; (iii) M received a written consent to provide the instant real estate as security for the purpose of raising the construction cost; and (iv) M succeeded to the status of a purchaser of the instant real estate by H.

B. We examine the judgment. The plaintiff's assertion is without merit on the ground that the defendant prepared a letter of confirmation on the transfer of real estate (Evidence No. 10) and a letter of consent to the provision of real estate security (Evidence No. 11) with the purport that M and H delegated the right to the provision of the real estate and the establishment of the right to collateral security (Evidence No. 11) with respect to the real estate of this case to M and H, and M succeeded to the status of purchaser as to the real

3. In conclusion, the decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.