Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 20, 2019, at around 12:52, the Defendant, at the E store operated by the victim D of the 1st floor of Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, was stolen without calculating the amount of 1,000 won, which was displayed by using the gaps in which the surveillance of the victim was neglected.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police concerning F of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the report of internal history (CCTV verification) of works damaged by the D’s written statement;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for confinement in a workhouse (in cases where a sentence of suspension of execution of punishment is invalidated or revoked and the amount of fine is not paid);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the suspended sentence recognizes the defendant's mistake, the value of damaged goods is 1,000 won and the defendant has repaid damages to the defendant. The defendant does not want the defendant's punishment. The defendant has been punished twice the previous case, but the defendant is punished by a fine, the defendant is aged 84 years old and the health is not good due to brain emercation, and the defendant's character and character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., other conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of the case, such as circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered.