logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.04.26 2016고단5457
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The National Housing Fund's structure of the fraudulent act of lending money to false workers is operating the system of lending money to workers who lend money to the National Housing Fund at a rate lower than that of the time when applying for a loan with only certain documents such as a certificate of employment, detailed statement of salary, etc. and a charter contract without any special security to stabilize the residence of homeless workers with the financial resources of the National Housing Fund.

그러나 근로자 주택 전세자금 대출 관련 업무를 위탁 받은 금융기관이 형식적인 심사만 하고 대출을 해 준다는 사실을 알고, 대출 브로커들은 허위로 임차인과 임대인 역할을 하는 사람들과 함께 근로자 주택 전세자금 대출금을 가로챌 것을 모의하였다.

Accordingly, loan broscers held false employment-related documents and false details related to the lessee as a person holding the name of the lending, and held false documents to the lessee who will perform the lease. The false lessee, as above, submitted documents related to the falsely prepared employment and the written contract for the lease of the house to the financial institution, and applied for the lease of the house to the employee while applying for the loan of the lease of the house to the financial institution. If the request for confirmation of the actual existence of the lease of the house enters into the financial institution, the lessor, who is obligated to perform the lease of the house, applied for the lease of the house of the employee and received the loan of the house of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the house

Specifically, the Defendant, as a false lessor, obtained a loan of the employee deposit money through the above methods, such as lending Brer C, loan broker D, false lessee E, etc., and offered them in order to have them divided.

According to the above public offering, the Defendant, who is a false lessor, receives KRW 2 million from “D” (D) around April 22, 2013.

arrow