1. The Defendants are located within the scope of the scope and scope of the materials indicated in the attached Table 2, among each real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list, and the scope and scope of the intent.

1. The assertion and judgment

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 as to the cause of the claim, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter "each of the instant land") is owned by the plaintiff, and the defendants installed two plastic greenhouses in the steel frame like the disposition No. 1 (hereinafter "the instant plastic greenhouse") and cultivated crops within the instant plastic greenhouse and possessed each of the instant land.

According to the above facts, the Defendants are obligated to remove the instant vinyl to the Plaintiff, collect crops planted in the instant vinyl, and deliver each of the instant land to the Plaintiff, except in extenuating circumstances.

B. The Defendants asserted that the instant land is not owned by the Plaintiff, since they completed the registration of ownership transfer without any ground, even though the Plaintiff did not purchase the real estate listed in [Attachment 1] List 2 (hereinafter “instant land”).

However, it is not sufficient to recognize the defendants' assertion only with the statement of No. 1, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the above assertion by the Defendants cannot be accepted.

C. According to the theory of the lawsuit, the Defendants are obligated to remove the instant vinyl to the Plaintiff, collect crops planted in the instant vinyl house, and deliver each of the instant land to the Plaintiff.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is with merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.