The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a CKanop vehicle around 19:10 on October 3, 2016; (b) finished the gas station at the E gas station located in the original city D; and (c) entered the west to the west and proceeded to a short distance flood.

At the time, there was a night, and there was three-lanes in which the passage of a vehicle was frequent. In such a case, the Defendant, who was engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, had a duty of care to safely enter the road and change the course in such a way that it does not interfere with the passage of other vehicles by giving an advance notice of the direction, etc. In addition, the Defendant did not point the direction, etc. but did not change the course from three lanes to one lane in the direction and right angle direction of other vehicles, and caused the injury to the victim by driving a victim G (25 years) who was driving a bicycle of CA110S engine to stop the two-lanes in the long distance from the front door of the road.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. The records of this case can be acknowledged that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant in the trial process. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.