All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant's punishment imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, while the prosecutor asserts that the sentence of the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. We examine the judgment on the grounds of appeal of this case. The circumstances favorable to the defendant (the defendant recognized the facts of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, most damaged goods were returned to victims, and victim D does not want punishment) and unfavorable circumstances (the crime of this case where the defendant habitually imprisoned victims, considering the contents and methods of the crime, etc., the nature of the crime of this case is not easy in light of the crime; the crime of this case is committed again during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime; the crime of this case is committed again during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime; the crime of this case is committed again during the period of repeated crime); the sentencing guidelines set by the court below in consideration of the various circumstances of the defendant; the sentencing range [the theft of general property; the three types, mitigation range (the same repeated crime; the habitual crime; the habitual crime; the victim; the victim's injury was recovered; the victim's injury was found to have been sentenced within the extent of six to one year, six-one years, and one year; the circumstances and circumstances of the defendant's age changes and the circumstances and circumstances of this case.

3. In conclusion, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s appeal are examined.