logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.04.11 2015가단30888
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. On January 2015, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion concluded a construction contract with the Defendant for the construction work of metal windows, i.e., self-fa, body fat, and various stairs iron systems among the instant construction work (hereinafter “instant construction work”) with the Defendant via B designated by the Defendant and completed the instant construction work.

The Plaintiff received only KRW 12,00,000 from D designated by B, and the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff the amount stated in the purport of the claim as the payment for the construction work.

B. First of all, the judgment is insufficient to acknowledge the above evidence as to whether the Defendant is a party to the instant construction contract, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit without further review.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow