1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the 7th to 17th page 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance was used as described in paragraph (2); and (b) the 7th page “ religious organization” in paragraph (14) is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the 7th page “ religious organization” is deemed to be a religious organization. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the

2. According to the relevant provisions of the Funeral Act, among those who intend to report the establishment of private prison facilities, religious organizations are required to attach documents evidencing that they are religious organizations, and documents evidencing that they are owned by religious organizations are not limited to the establishment period, size, number of believers, size of property, etc. of religious organizations. The instant report is deemed to have all the report and accompanying documents required under Article 18(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Funeral Act, Article 7(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Funeral Act, and Article 7(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Funeral Act. In addition, the report of this case is deemed to have been provided with both the report and accompanying documents, which are ideological elements for the declaration, execution of consciousness, and edification of the religious organization Gap as the main purpose, and the report of this case as the representative of the 1st trial, the personal and organizational elements of the 1st trial, and the establishment of the 209Du6766, Sept. 8, 2011.