Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On February 23, 2016, on the grounds that the Defendant, at Osan-si B around 02:05, engaged in drinking in drinking at the bar near the Plaintiff’s trade name and solicited the Defendant to return home at the above drinking house, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant “Im-C” was “Im-C” in front of D, operated by the victim C, in the vicinity of the said drinking house; and (b) destroyed the Defendant’s property at approximately KRW 500,000 by walking the glass window on the left side of the Defendant’s left side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and Article 366 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The responsibility is not weak in that the instant crime was committed for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment, and the crime of this case was committed in favor of the victim during the period of repeated crime.

On the other hand, the fact of crime is recognized and the circumstances agreed with the victim are also recognized.

A fine shall be imposed in full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case.