1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

From April 26, 2013, the Plaintiff is a person who worked as a steel framed assistant in the construction site of the Hasco 1 factory site (hereinafter “the construction site of this case”) to be performed by the Multiwon Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant construction site”).

원고는 2013. 5. 28. 10:30경 이 사건 공사현장에서 철근을 들다가 허리를 삐끗하는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라고 한다)를 당하여 요추부 염좌에 관한 요양승인을 받고 2013. 8. 15. 요양을 종결하였다.

On January 28, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that “propin escape from the signboard (hereinafter “the instant injury”) was caused by the Plaintiff’s work imposing a burden on Israri during the past, including the instant accident, and applied for approval of medical care for the instant injury and disease to the Defendant.

On May 14, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to approve the Plaintiff’s application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant injury to the Plaintiff was a duplicative disease and the Plaintiff’s work ability is short and thus the correlation with the Plaintiff’s work is not recognized.

【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, entry of Gap evidence 2 and 3, and the purport of the entire argument as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate or not, the plaintiff argued that since around 2007, the plaintiff continued to perform his/her business, mainly from around 2007, he/she works as a private-use steel-frame, with a view to 45 degrees or more, or listens to heavy things.

Ultimately, the injury or disease of this case occurred due to the Plaintiff’s work, and the injury or disease of this case was worse due to the accident that occurred while on duty.

Therefore, although the Plaintiff’s injury or disease was caused and aggravated due to the Plaintiff’s work, the Defendant’s disposition that did not recognize the proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s work branch of this case and the Plaintiff’s work is unlawful.

Facts of recognition

In addition, the employment insurance statement for the plaintiff of medical opinion is the daily work statement.