logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.04.04 2013노1392
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (hereinafter referred to as the "fine 3,000,000") that the court below rendered is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment has the record of being punished several times for the same crime, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act or a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and committed the crime of this case during the suspended execution period. However, there is a disadvantage to the defendant. However, the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth through the living under confinement, etc., the defendant is going to not re-assign the vehicle after transferring the vehicle in the name of the wife used for the crime of this case, and there was no accident in the course of driving, and taking full account of the various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, etc., the prosecutor's above assertion by the prosecutor is not acceptable since it is too unreasonable to accept the prosecutor's above assertion.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow