The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the house and land in Kimpo-si D, E, and F, and the victim G is the owner of the house and land in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

The Defendant: (a) laid down the victim G on the front end of his house; (b) set up an I Twitter, one of his own possession, before the victim G from January 31, 2015 to February 13, 2015; and (c) obstructed the victim’s landscaping by force by preventing vehicles from passing through which the victim fright trees breadbed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and J;

1. Entry of the inspection protocol of this court;

1. On-site images [No. 11] of six copies of field photographs (No. 6 copies of evidence list No. 11] (the defendant and his defense counsel claimed that not only did not have the intention to interfere with the business of the defendant, but also the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act that constitutes a justifiable act, and thus the illegality of the defendant's act is dismissed. Thus, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, ① the defendant and the victim suffered conflict due to drainage, etc., at the time when the victim embling the above problem, it seems that the conflict has been deepened. ② The land owned by the defendant and the victim are adjacent to the land owned by the victim and the part filled up by the victim (this part and the E land boundary of the above E), if the defendant enters the land owned by the victim, the above plastic house exists, and ③ The vehicle necessary for the business of the above plastic house can not come out of the land owned by the victim.