Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On March 27, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Changwon District Court on March 27, 202, for six months and two years of probation
4. 4. The judgment became final and conclusive.
【Criminal Facts】
On December 16, 2019, the Defendant accepted the defective proposal that the Defendant would deposit the company's funds and would receive loans at a low interest if the Defendant purchased B gift certificates and deliver them to the employees of the company because it is difficult to lend a normal method due to a lack of financial transaction performance while consulting with the name infinites and infinites who are the cause of the organization of the telephone financial fraud organization, and notified the account number (D) of the Crinites in the name of the Defendant.
On December 16, 2019, a person who is not the name of the telephone financial fraud organization, assumes an employee of the F Bank by telephone to the victim E and assumes a false statement to the effect that “it is possible to make a refund to the maximum of KRW 57 million to the 8.2% interest rate. It is possible to make a loan to the maximum of KRW 57 million. In order to make a loan, only a part of the existing loan shall be repaid, and the loan shall be in progress in order to do so.” Accordingly, on December 16, 2019, it was remitted from the victim to the above CF account in the name of the defendant around 12:30.
The Defendant already delivered cash in such a way as above or delivered a check card to the account, thereby recognizing the fact that, as the Defendant was experienced in committing the so-called telephone financial fraud by deceiving the victim, etc., the Defendant purchased 100,000 won gift certificates from the original datum B located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si and then delivered it to another person under the direction of the person who was not killed in the name in the name of the deceased in the name.
Accordingly, the defendant, by facilitating the fraud of the above-mentioned person, assisted the crime.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement of the police statement of E;
1. Details of the financial transaction and reply data, and the Kakao Stockholm dialogue;
1. Judgment.