Defendants are not guilty.

1. Facts charged;

A. Defendant A stated “R” in the indictment of Gyeong-gun, public official, and official (hereinafter “D”) around May 2015, but this is obvious that it is a clerical error in the “D” and thus, is corrected ex officio.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO, where the victim P (56 tax) and Q (45 tax) were cultivated in a deep-sea area for the purpose of this feed, in order to carry out a rice farming house, the above land on which the grass for feed growing is growing as a twitter, thereby damaging the above land with approximately KRW 2.5 million in the market price, and impeding the farming business of the victims.

B. Defendant B: (a) around April 2016, the Defendant: (b) destroyed the Plaintiff’s farming business at a place where the Victim P and Q Q were in cultivation of the vegetable tree in Korea, F, G, H, H, I, J, K, K, L, M, N, andO; and (c) destroyed the Plaintiff’s vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable with the instant land on which the vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vege

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the conviction of guilt ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. If there is no evidence to form such a conviction, even if there is suspicion of guilt against the defendant, the determination is inevitable in the interests of the defendant.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the evidence produced by the prosecutor alone was proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to the facts charged.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

1) The victim P directly considered in the investigative agency that the defendants cultivated by the victims as the Tracker.

In this court, it did not directly see such facts, and it was transferred from the victim Q.

was stated.

(ii)..