The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant works for the promotion company company.

On July 25, 2008, D Co., Ltd. newly constructed a military unit of 6501 unit in the Army located in Gwanak-dong-dong-si, the government, and as a result, concluded a contract to acquire land, E, etc. and planned to build a new apartment on the ground thereof. From July 2010, D attempted to conclude a contract for the filial duty and the above construction from around July 2010, but did not reach an agreement. On October 17, 2011, D entered into a contract for each of the above construction with the promotion company, the filial duty of which is 46% equity shares.

D Co., Ltd. demanded a guarantee of completion of liability to an enzymn and promoting company for the project financing of the above construction, but it could not carry out the construction on the wind to refuse the effectiveness, and on March 16, 2012, the promotion company was released from the said contract upon the agreement of both parties on March 14, 2012.

“.” However, the document was sent to the Seoul Central District Court: (a) arguing that the said contract is still effective; (b) asserting that D unilaterally rescinded the contract while unilaterally delaying the commencement of construction without any justifiable reason, and filed a lawsuit to seek compensation for damages of KRW 3.2 billion since it was in an impossible condition to implement the said construction works. (b) On January 30, 2013, the Defendant testified to the effect that, at the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court, 2012 plus 2012 between Plaintiff D and Defendant Promotion Company, Inc., Ltd., and Defendant 531048, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the said damages case, and testified to the presiding judge. The Defendant testified to the effect that “F of Construction Company, at the Promotion Company on March 14, 2013, had a meeting with respect to the rescission of the said contract for construction works, which was established,

However, the above F was present at the meeting together with G, a director of D.