logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.11.30 2017고단3082
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In January 2012, the Defendant was working in the steel (ju) of the members of Ansan-si, the Sungdong-dong, 625-3, and was asked from the Defendant to process the steel product in the steel product (ju), and was willing to remove and sell the steel product under custody in the steel product (ju).

On January 4, 2012, at around 06:53, the Defendant sold 4,400,000 won in total as the market value owned by the victim to C, who is an employee of the business partner, between the company’s failure to monitor the company within the steel D’s building and caused C to steal it into the cargo vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written inquiry, etc. in light of the current status of root;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. Investigation report (specific time of crime), investigation report (to hear D phone statements and to apply Acts and subordinate statutes to specific victims);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the choice of punishment for the crime [the scope of recommending punishment] The basic area (from June to one year and six months) of the Act on the Theft of General Property (the scope of recommending punishment] has no person [the person who is subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] recognized the defendant's mistake and reflects it, and the fact that the defendant's health status is not good.

However, it is inevitable to sentence a sentence in light of the unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the degree of damage caused by the instant crime is not less severe, that has not been recovered until now, that has long been long, and that the Defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime.

The same sentence as the order shall be determined in consideration of the above circumstances and the conditions of the sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.

arrow