Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, “2013 Highly 93” from November 15, 201 to December 15, 201, arbitrarily removed and damaged the greenhouse-type D owned by the victim D, which was located in Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Sonyang-gu, Seoul, from November 15, 201 to KRW 6 million.

2. "2013 Highly 796".

A. On December 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 13:35, and around 13:35, the fact that the victim F (the 50-year-old victim F (the 50-year-old victim F) was able to repair and use the facility from H; (b) the said facility considered H to operate the facility; and (c) the partner, who was a partner, did not receive a part of the construction cost, was hhh in mind to avoid the facility without his own telephone; and (d) 3 times away from the floor of the facility; and (c) flick, which was managed by the victim F, of the vehicle, flive the repair cost of approximately KRW 300,000.

B. At around 17:40 on January 1, 2013, the Defendant laid the stone, etc. on the floor of a certain area for the same reasons as “1” at the same place as “the foregoing paragraph (1), thereby impairing the effectiveness of “G” glass windows managed by the said victim F, thereby impairing approximately KRW 270,000 of the repair cost to cover approximately KRW 270,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Court rulings;

1. Application of the statutes governing building photographs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the same Act concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged reveals that, around 00:25 on January 14, 2013, the Defendant, even though he was under the suspension of the pedestrian crossing signal on the street 696-3 Standju, he was "under the influence of alcohol" and returned home.