A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On January 12, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for embezzlement, etc. at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on August 12, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 20, 201.

[2] On September 29, 2009, the Defendant knew that the victim C was unable to receive approximately KRW 200 million from D, and at around 13:30 on September 29, 2009, the Defendant is obliged to receive money from D, and the Defendant is obliged to receive money from D, once it intends to receive money from D.

D is implementing the reconstruction of the apartment of the innate E, and the inside of the house is helping to work, and in relation to this, it is necessary to lend the bonds equivalent to one billion won.

In order to do so, first, it is necessary to cancel from the security equivalent to 100 million won which is suffering from the above apartment.

If you lend KRW 50,000,000,000 to the current 50,000 won, you will pay KRW 50,000,000 to D with a loan of KRW 1 billion to the police officer in October.

The remainder of 100 million won shall be responsible for and repaid to the police officer in March.

If a loan of 1 billion won is not granted, the loan of 50 million won is returned again.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant tried to prepare land purchase expenses for the E apartment reconstruction project that is in progress by D, and the victim was aware that the E apartment reconstruction project is being carried out well-being, so the victim borrowed money for the expenses required for the cancellation of collateral, so even if the victim borrowed money for the expenses required for the cancellation of collateral, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to cancel the collateral or to receive the loan of KRW 1 billion, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money from the damaged party for other business expenses, so there was no intention or ability to repay the money to the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and up to October 1, 2009, KRW 50 million in the name of the cost of release from security at the bank account (Account Number G) in the name of F around October 1, 2009.