logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.03.27 2014고정159
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

After the victim B and his wife C purchased 1.4880,000,000,000 won of 1.48880,000,000 won of 30,000 won of 950,000 won of 300,000 won of 300,000 won of 40,000 won of 30,000 won of 30,000 won of 40,000 won of 30,000 won of 4

1. On June 16, 2010, the Defendant issued an appraisal company an appraisal statement of KRW 1.980,000 to C within the Defendant’s Ecuas car volume parked in front of the F apartment at the Namyang-si city, which stated that the Defendant would make a false statement of KRW 1.5 billion if he/she applies for a loan to the bank with the said appraisal statement, the Defendant would immediately make a loan to the bank, and if he/she introduced the bank to allow the loan, he/she would have to take personnel management for the quasi-party who introduced the bank to receive the loan, which would cause KRW 10,000 to be remitted to the head of the Tong.

However, the fact did not have the intention or ability to reduce the amount of money to the person who arranged the bank.

The Defendant, by deceiving C as such, had C transfer KRW 10 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (G) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. On July 27, 2010, when the Defendant intends to apply for a new loan to the victim C within the Defendant’s Ecoos car amount parked in front of the above F apartment, he/she must re-establish a written appraisal of 2 billion won, and the expenses incurred in creating the said appraisal report are KRW 2.5 billion and the money was remitted to the head of the Tong.

However, there was no intention or ability to apply for a new loan by creating an appraisal report.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim C, received KRW 2.5 million from the victim C via the agricultural bank passbook in the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B and C;

1. Application of investigation reports (attached data) and investigation reports ( telephone communications)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow