1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claims extended by this court are dismissed, respectively.

2. This is due to the extension of claims for the costs of appeal.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The forest land of this case (hereinafter “the forest land of this case”) is the forest land owned by 50248/50579 shares, and E owns 331/50579 shares, respectively.

B. The Plaintiff managing the instant forest land as D. D. The Plaintiff filed an application for the “private tree afforestation project” with Gohap-gun in December 2013, 201 for the purpose of cutting down pine trees in the instant forest land and planting economic water. On April 1, 2014, Gohap-gun left 50 copies of the existing tree (pine trees) per 1 year, and approved a forest management plan (hereinafter “the instant afforestation project”). On April 2, 2014, the Plaintiff signed a contract with the Defendant for the removal of pine trees from 40,000 to 11,70 to 50 to 4,000 to 5,000 to 4,000 to 1,000 to 4,000 to 4,000 to 1,000 to 4,000 to 5,000 to 4,000 to 1,000 to 4,000 to 4,000.