Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 22, 2013, the Defendant was issued a five-year decision to attach a location tracking device in the case of an attachment order after the judgment of the first instance court. On October 25, 2013, the Defendant was imposed a special rule on the following: “I will not drink more than 0.05% of blood alcohol level, and will comply with the probation officer’s inspection on drinking alcohol level.”

Around 10:00 on May 21, 2019, the Defendant measured whether he/she was drinking at “C” around Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the blood alcohol level was 0.141.1%, and on June 26, 2019, the Defendant violated the above special rules of the court without justifiable grounds, such as the measurement of whether he/she was drinking at the upper end of the Gyeonggi-si Civil Service Center in the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 362, the blood alcohol level was 0.161%.

around 00:30 on September 14, 2019, the Defendant drinks alcohol to 0.106% of the blood alcohol concentration at the main points of the trade in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, from around 00:30 on September 14, 2019.

As a result, the Defendant violated the above special rules to say that he does not drink more than 0.05% of alcohol level without justifiable grounds.

"2019 High Court 1974"

A. On September 6, 2019, the Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the disturbance of revocation of the owner of a government office), demanded a police officer, who was under the influence of alcohol, to catch a taxi on the “F police box” located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

At this time, police officers did not say that they would directly bring a taxi out of the Defendant, “monthly salary is the same as bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” “this degree of bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and “the police officers were unable to do so,” even if the Defendant was sent out of several times, the police officers did not immediately work for the same time and police officers did not take a cell phone image, and police officers took a photograph of the cell phone image, and they did so.