logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.06.27 2018구합14351
영업정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a long-term care household for the elderly under Article 2 subparag. 4 of the former Long-Term Care Insurance Act (amended by Act No. 15881, Dec. 11, 2018; hereinafter “former Long-Term Care Insurance Act for the Aged”) by a long-term care institution under Article 2 subparag. 4 of the former Long-Term Care Insurance Act for the Aged (amended by Act No. 15442, Mar. 13, 2018; hereinafter “former Long-Term Care Insurance Act for the Aged”) in the building B and the 6th floor of the same building, and two care centers for the elderly under Article 34(1)2 of the former Welfare Act (amended by Act No. 1542, Mar. 13, 2018; hereinafter “Welfare Welfare Act”).

The allowance costs were paid on the ground that the beneficiary D who failed to provide 1-month care costs per annum (won) had resided from July 2016 to October 2016. However, in fact, the allowance costs were paid on the ground that the beneficiary E has resided on September 11, 2016, 15, 23 and 10.10. However, in fact, the allowance costs were paid on the ground that the beneficiary E has resided on September 1, 2016, 205, 205, 160 and 20-7. In order to receive additional allowance costs from 205, 1603, 160, 200. From November 2 and 2016 to October 3, 2017, 2016 to be paid from 20.6, 205, 16.6.

arrow