beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant in the facts charged: (a) around 01:00 on April 6, 2016, the Defendant: (b) was on the side of the instant case where E, a company fee, was in the instant singing room with the first story of Pyeongtaek-si C, in the singing room;
E’s female-friendly job offers victim F(F, 30 years of age) reported that they are generated from the shock shock of alcohol, the chest was delivered once with the victim’s clothes, and the victim’s chest was stored in the second clothes, and the victim’s chest was indecently committed on one occasion.
2. At the time of the instant judgment, at the same time, the Defendant and F were not able to look back the chest of F, which is a part of the Defendant’s pro-friendly company, and the Defendant could see at any time the Defendant and F at any time when she opened a singing in the same space as F’s male-friendly job offering E, as the Defendant’s pro-friendly company line.
In such a situation, it is an example that the defendant approach the F to the F, which the defendant is enjoying, and the chest of F.
In light of the Defendant’s attitude immediately following the instant case, even if the F’s statement was based on F’s statement, the Defendant considered F’s view that F was clicked with the Defendant’s her eye while resisting the eye.
As the fighting has continued, F was also showing the F's blick with the criminal defendant in the latter case.
In addition, at the same time, F was in the situation where he was frightened and frightened after being frightened in a singing room because it was found at the first and second singing singing room, and the degree of conduct that F made in this court was not the degree to have a hand in which he was frightened with a hand, but the hand was frighted with a part of Twits, and the hand was frightened with a hand, and the hand was frightened with the upper part of the chest. Even according to F’s statement, F did not gright immediately after the hand was frighted, F thought that it was erroneous, and then grighted after 2 seconds. F did not see that the defendant was frighten or returned to fright, and the statement made in the police record and the statement made by the police.