A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant received a summary order of KRW 7 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the support for the development of the Suwon Friwon method on August 26, 2015. On June 14, 2013, the same kind of power as the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime in the same court on June 14, 2013.

[2] On January 26, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.070% in blood at around 03:57, the Defendant driven a fdisty car at a section of about 500 meters from the front line of the air exhauster in Dongjak-gu Seoul, Seoul, to the front line of the low-carbon engine displacement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the circumstances of a driver driving a drinking, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, inquiry of the results of crackdown on drinking and the details of crackdown;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, a report on investigation (Attachment to a summary order), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each summary order;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment with prison labor (the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor in consideration of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant has been punished three times due to drinking driving and that he/she again commits the instant crime even though he/she has been punished due to drinking driving, and that he/she has

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Small Quantity (i.e., the fact that the defendant recognizes all criminal facts and reflects the criminal facts; the fact that there is no penalty heavier than the fine before the instant case; the fact that the amount of alcohol concentration in blood is relatively low and the distance in which the driver drivess alcohol is not long);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) (recognating the reason for reduction of the amount of punishment) or more of the Criminal Act;