The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor to the gist of the grounds for appeal, although the defendant could fully recognize the fact that the defendant caused a traffic accident and proceeded without stopping immediately while the vehicle owned by the victim was damaged, resulting in traffic danger and impediment, the court below acquitted the defendant of the facts charged in this case, which is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaged in driving a car with C.

On July 9, 2016, the Defendant came to turn to the left at the second two-lanes of the 4-lanes, namely, NC department stores located in the NC department department, which is located in the Dong-gu Municipal Ordinance of Macheon-si, in order to turn to the right.

In such cases, the driver had a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving on the front side and the left side, and by safely driving on the vehicular road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the right-hand turn from the two-lanes, which was owned by the victim D, who was left left at the right-hand turn on the two-lanes of the two-lanes, and later received the right-hand part of the E-benz car as the front-hand part of the car above.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing such duties, stopped immediately and escaped without taking necessary measures for dealing with the accident, even though the repair cost of KRW 939,400, such as the following pans, was damaged to the extent of the above benz car.

B. In light of the following circumstances, the lower court determined that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was proven to the extent that “the Defendant was in need of taking measures to prevent and eliminate risks and obstacles to traffic at the time of leaving the scene of an accident to ensure smooth traffic,” to the extent that it could exclude a reasonable doubt based on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.”

For reasons that it is difficult to see this case’s charges, the Defendant is innocent.