logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.18 2015나2075726
해고무효확인
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the witness of the court of first instance is as follows; "263,470,559" in the second part of the second part of the second part of the second part of the second part is as "263,470,558"; "2,794,56,833" in the last part of the same Table is as "2,794,56,933"; "5" in the fifth part of the first part of the first part of the first part of the first part is as "5 evidence (including number; hereinafter the same shall apply); "paragraph 5" in the first part of the first part of the first part of the first part is as "paragraph 5"; "Article 30 (1)" in the second part of the second part of the second part of the second part is as "Article 23 (1)"; "the second part of the second part of the second part of the second part is as "the second part of the first part of the second part of the payment date" and the second part of the second part of the second part of the appeal.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that each of the labor contracts of this case was concluded by the plaintiffs' declaration of intention not to be the truth or the defendant's coercion as grounds for appeal.

B. However, the judgment is not sufficient to acknowledge the fact that the statement No. 6, the witness evidence of the first instance court, the witness evidence of the first instance court, and the witness evidence of the first instance court and the witness evidence of the first instance court and each testimony of the first instance court K, L alone are the same as the purport of the assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and the above assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow