All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Basic Facts

On November 10, 2007, Plaintiff A was co-defendants of the first instance court. On February 6, 2013, Plaintiff D and E jointly paid KRW 230 million to the Plaintiffs. The decision of recommending reconciliation became final and conclusive on February 6, 2013.

A person who is working in the Fsanbu Hospital and Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “nuribu Hospital”) in which the plaintiff C is working, and the plaintiff B is the husband of the plaintiff A and the father of the plaintiff C.

The Defendant is a legal entity that operates an Aju University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) that was transferred to the Plaintiff C following the birth of the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff A, from the non-party hospital to the delivery of the plaintiff C, was admitted to the non-party hospital at around 11:00 on November 9, 2007, which was the first day of pregnancy 39 weeks (hereinafter the same day, omitted the date and entered only time) and was hospitalized to the non-party hospital at around 22:00.

On November 10, 2007, at around 00:00, the medical personnel of the non-party hospital inserted 1 pins flus flus that promotes only by cutting down the womb to the plaintiff A, and around 05:40, the opening size of the plaintiff A's flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus

Plaintiff

A around 06:00 pamba, A was completely opened in 07:45.

Since then D, at around 09:35, the second period of delivery in consideration of the state of Plaintiff A refers to the period from the complete opening of the gymological landscape to the birth of the fetus. The implementation only was made for the purpose of reducing B, and the Plaintiff A only divided the Plaintiff C of 3.3km of the body around 09:38.

After the delivery, the medical personnel of the non-party hospital supplied the plaintiff C with 3 liter’s oxygen per minute, so that the plaintiff C was not blick, pulmonary rules, and without any reaction to the stimulation, and the G of the non-party hospital performed ampl-baging.

Nevertheless, at around 09:45, the value of the plaintiff C's child delivery map.