1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Judgment as to the main claim

A. From January 14, 2011 to April 2, 2011, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion supplied the Defendant with electric appliances equivalent to KRW 165,554,930, a total of KRW 165,554,930, in the construction site of Gwangju-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu

B. As to whether the Plaintiff supplied electrical appliances under the supply contract with the Defendant, comprehensively taking account of the following facts: (a) the Defendant subcontracted the electrical construction of Gwangju and fish plant to the D Company, E Company, and F Company; (b) Company B; and F Company A; and (c) the specifications (Evidence A No. 1) and written request (Evidence A) submitted by the Plaintiff were all indicated as the supply of electrical appliances equivalent to KRW 24,51,539, and KRW 17,561,90, and KRW 24,539, and KRW 24,51,539, and KRW 17,561,90, and each of the testimony made with respect to the Plaintiff; and (c) the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not have any other evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s each of the supply contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant in light of the fact that each of the Plaintiff’s supply of the electrical appliances was insufficient; and (d) the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not have any other evidence to acknowledge each of the supply contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

Therefore, it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s primary claim.

2. Judgment on the conjunctive claim