beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
(a) Defendant C and D jointly KRW 38,400,00;
B. The said amount is KRW 38,400,000, in collaboration with the said Defendants.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. F is a substantial operator who exercises overall control over the internal and external affairs of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) established for the purpose of foreign exchange transactions, etc., and H opened, operated and managed a car page “I” on the Internet to promote the company as a means of fund raising by the said company, and J was registered as a representative director of the said company on June 30, 2009 at the time of registering the incorporation of the company, and was registered as the same auditor on January 18, 2010.
B. Defendant C, on the Internet, sought a bulletin board for debate on securities and publicized “I”, and Defendant B, D, and E, upon H’s request, received a commission in an amount equivalent to 10-15% of the transaction price by soliciting purchase of shares and providing investment consultation by telephone after obtaining personal information from its members.
C. F set up “I” on the K website in the form of “Fx Min, futures company, the Republic of L, new stocks, non-listed stocks, unlisted stocks, non-listed stocks, a promising owner, overseas construction, promising companies,” with the amount equivalent to 30% of the investment principal as an investment inducement allowance, and the J employs H, while assisting the F. H, while engaging in the company’s overall business. H provided public relations to G in the form of “Fx Min, futures company, the Republic of L.S., new stocks, non-listed stocks, a promising owner, a promising owner, an overseas construction, and a promising company.”
On the other hand, H agrees to pay 2,00 won per member to those who have interest in securities or investment through the Internet and induce membership to become a member, and employs Defendant C and set up 10-15% of the investment principal as an allowance for attracting investment in the above company. Defendant B, D, and E employed each of Defendant B, and Defendant B, D, and E to transfer personal information of the carpet members and publish the carpet member in the carpet, even if the opinion on purchase of shares and investment is based on the opinion on the purchase of shares, the principal, the risk management, and the principal to the carpet members.