The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year and eight months of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to complete sexual assault treatment programs, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. Even when considering the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant’s confinement life, the lower court’s sentence is unreasonable because it is too unreasonable in full view of the following as a whole: (a) even though the Defendant had been subject to criminal punishment due to the administration of narcotics prior to the lapse of 14 years; (b) smoked marijuana several times and administered philopon one time at the time; (c) the degree of each crime committed by the Defendant committed by the victim in an internal relationship; (d) the victim suffered considerable physical and mental pain; and (e) other factors of sentencing indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.