logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.25 2017고정1333
권리행사방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (V, 19 years old) of 2017, "2017 High 133, are between 8 months and 8 months.

1. On July 2, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the exercise of rights, on the grounds that the victim drinks with another male and female, prior to D main points in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, the Defendant: (a) opened the victim’s name in a manner that arbitrarily takes the mobile phone equivalent to KRW 1 million at the market price used by the victim without the consent of the injured party; and (b) obstructed the victim’s exercise of rights on the mobile phone.

2. The Defendant committed assault on the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph 1 continuously and on the same ground as that set forth in paragraph 1.

3. The Defendant damaged the property by putting 5,000 won of the market price owned by the victim in hand at the time and place indicated in paragraph 1, at the time and place, the property was removed, and the property was damaged on the floor.

"2017 High 1341"

4. The criminal is also a person who sirens in his name a No. SM5 car as E’s friendship.

E, on August 23, 2016, around 05:00, 05:0, while driving the said car at the front intersection of the new bank of Daegu-dong-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong-dong (Seoul-dong), it did not take necessary measures such as causing traffic accidents and providing relief to victims.

The Defendant knew that E committed the above crime, but at the F Prosecutor’s Office located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, on February 3, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the Prosecutor G of the above Public Prosecutor’s Office who is investigating the said case as having caused a traffic accident.

As a result, the defendant had a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment escape.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 High Doz. 133"

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Photographs "2017 Mano 1341";

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect by each prosecutor against the defendant or E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each police statement of the defendant and H with respect to the defendant (including the whole part) 1.

arrow