logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.12.01 2014가단18994
퇴직금 등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,280,702 as well as 6% per annum from July 10, 201 to June 25, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 8, 2000, the Plaintiff joined Cluribide Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Cluribide”) and retired on June 25, 201.

B. Crine was merged with the Defendant on June 30, 2015, and the Defendant taken over the instant litigation procedure.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence No. 20, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s claim for retirement allowance of KRW 52,482,270, the annual paid leave allowance of KRW 1,679,764, the annual paid leave allowance of KRW 1,708, the annual paid leave allowance of KRW 1,702,876, the annual paid leave allowance of KRW 2,631,578, the annual paid leave allowance of KRW 2,631,578, and the annual paid leave allowance of KRW 2,631,578, the annual paid leave allowance of KRW 2,631,578.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the above money and damages for delay to the plaintiff.

3. Determination

A. The following facts are: (a) there is no dispute over the determination of the portion of a claim for a retirement allowance; (b) each entry in the evidence Nos. 1-6, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, and 24 (including each number number; hereinafter the same shall apply); (c) the Plaintiff was paid the benefits corresponding to the amount of the retirement allowance for 2 months in the 12th month in each year; and (d) the statement in the payment statement of the Clid gender included the amount of the retirement allowance from June to August in each year from 2001 to June 2009; and (b) Clid gender included the amount of the retirement allowance included in the annual salary in the employment contract concluded with the employees since before 2006; (c) the officer appears to have received the interim payment from the employees to have received the interim payment of the retirement allowance; and (c) there is no evidence to deem that the Plaintiff did not pay the interim retirement allowance to the Plaintiff.

arrow