A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 04:40 on July 25, 2018, the Defendant reported several times to the effect that “C real estate” in front of “C real estate,” located in U.S. Dong-gu, U.S., U.S., U.S. and U.S., U.S., U.S. (hereinafter “C real estate”), “A.S. E,” and “I.S., I, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., and U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., and U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S.

It is not necessary to do so. In light of this, this son’s bath theory, this Ma Ma Ma Ma, and in view of the above E’s chest part by hand, he assaulted E who is a police official, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A table of notification to the department reporting each 112 Incident;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on documentary video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The decision of sentencing guidelines for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act shall be applied [the scope of recommendations] interference with the performance of official duties, and the decision of sentencing that there is no person in the basic area (from June to June) [the person who is subject to special sentencing]: a suspended sentence of one year in six months, a state law and order for community service 40 hours in order to establish a state law and order and eradicate the light of public authority, a strict group of crimes that interfere with the performance of official duties is needed.

Due to Defendant’s abusive theory, it seems that the insult of victim police officers was reasonable.

However, the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflected his mistake.

The degree of violence is not severe, and the damaged police officer did not have any injury.

Although the defendant has been punished twice by a fine for another crime, he/she shall interfere with the performance of the same kind of official duties.