Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the answer in Busan-gun D.

On July 20, 2012, around 14:30 on July 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) destroyed one lock with which the market price cannot be determined by putting the corrected locks installed at the water entrance of “E” located in Busan Island-gun.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the witness F’s statutory statement Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. Facts constituting the 2012 High Court 1709";

A. On July 20, 2012, at around 09:47, the Defendant: (a) opened a entrance at the body of “E” located in Busan District captain D, with the entrance of the victim locked from the water surface to the steel accident, and intruded into the structure of the victim.

B. At around 14:30 on the same day as the above “A”, the Defendant re-entered the victim’s structure in order to conduct a brupting work on the ground above water as a brucator at the same place.

"2013, 174"

C. On September 14, 2012, around 10:36, the Defendant leased the land owned by the Defendant to KRW 5 million a monthly rent of KRW 1 million on October 15, 2009, and, on the mutual basis, filed a lawsuit claiming lease deposit, etc. against the Defendant, with the knowledge that the victim, who had engaged in the scrap metal wholesale business on October 15, 2009, was unable to engage in the scrap metal wholesale business on the said land at the latest, and infringed upon the Defendant’s structure by entering the leased land through a door connected to the Defendant’s house, which was connected to the Plaintiff’s house, and was used by the public official in charge of Busan, who was aware of the said fact.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence examined by this court, the Defendant is the owner of the land of 2,368 square meters in Busan-gun, Busan-gun (hereinafter “instant land”). On September 15, 2010, the 350 square meters out of the instant land and the additional part between the Defendant and the victim.