logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.06 2016가합543568
사해행위취소
Text

1. As to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff:

A. As to KRW 1,039,460,408 and KRW 866,96,373 among them, Defendant B Co., Ltd.

Reasons

A. The Defendant Credit Guarantee Fund issued a letter of credit guarantee to Defendant B. (1) The Defendant Credit Guarantee Fund shall provide credit guarantee between Defendant B and Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “instant credit guarantee”).

Defendant B entered into an agreement with the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund as collateral, and imported goods by issuing an import letter of credit under the Plaintiff’s guarantee (the credit guarantee of this case). From 150,00,000 to 150 on June 16, 2011, to 236,50,000 on June 15, 201, Defendant B did not request the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund to provide credit guarantee loans (other credit guarantee loans) 7-1,236,50,000 on October 19 to 18, 2013 7-1, 7-1, 7-1,7,73423,000,000 on April 7, 2014 to 206-4, 206-16-6, 206-4, 2017-6, 204, 207.

Accordingly, around June 18, 2015, Defendant B entered into a credit guarantee agreement of this case as a guarantee to recover the third credit guarantee letter of this case with Defendant Credit Guarantee Fund, and on the same day (Evidence No. 11-2) “Guarantee Special Agreement” column, “this letter of guarantee is the guarantee to recover the certificate E (Guarantee Number of the third credit guarantee letter of this case).”

arrow