(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.10.27 2017고정657

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.10.27 2017고정657

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim D(the age of 35) are legal relationships.

On February 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 10:00, within the residence of the victim in Daejeon Seo-gu E and 201, on the same day; and (b) on the ground that the victim did not take part in the consultation for divorce scheduled at the Family Court around 09:00 on the same day; (c) the Defendant was the victim and the victim did not have any error in the court.

Don't we see the same person.

"In doing so, the head of the victim was flicked with the balth of the victim, flicked with the wall, flicked with the balth of the victim, flicked with the balth of the victim, and flicked the victim's body, and flicked the victim's head with the body of the victim's body, and flicked the victim's head with the back of the balth of the victim's body in order to escape from this, the victim was flicked with the inner bottom of the victim's body, and the victim was flicked with the part of the victim in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant did not assault or injure the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following circumstances, namely, ① the victim sent a letter to the investigative agency, stating that “The family court did not reply with the defendant in relation to the divorce counseling with the defendant, and the defendant did not reply to this.”

Whether or not the defendant was distorted in the court and ‘the defendant was found.'

Is there only for the same person,

2. The term “assumptives” are written.

참조조문

-형법 제69조 제2항

-형법 제70조 제1항

-형법 제257조 제1항

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2019.06.14 2019고합114

-청주지방법원 2017.09.29 2017고합140

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2021.03.08 2020고정243

-청주지방법원 영동지원 2016.09.22 2016고단86

-대구지방법원 2016.06.02 2016고단1587