logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.05.04 2018고단70
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 24, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch branch branch branch branch. On April 23, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for the same crime from the same support.

[2] On January 3, 2018, the Defendant driven CPoter-II cargo vehicles under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.122% from the 6km to the roads near the Red Marart located in the 13th coast of Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, to the 2086 neighboring roads of Seopo-si, Seopo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs and reports on traffic accidents (on-site survey reports);

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: (A) a response to inquiries, such as criminal history, etc.; (b) a high-level of 7264 high-level subsidiary of the Busan District Court; and (c) a high-level of 2010 high-level subsidiary of the Busan District Court Act and subordinate statutes 2757;

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though he/she was punished for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on two occasions, the Defendant’s crime is not weak in light of the fact that he/she repeats the crime.

However, the defendant's final records of punishment for driving prior to drinking of this case are 2010 years, and the defendant's failure to repeat the crime of this case against the crime of this case

A fine shall be selected only once in consideration of the fact that the fine is in progress, etc.

The sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be considered together, and the sentence shall be determined as ordered.

arrow