1. The defendant

A. Each of the Plaintiff A and B KRW 11,409,830, Plaintiff C and D, respectively, and each of them shall be KRW 22,819,660 and each of them.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) project approval and publication - Urban planning facility project (e.g., project for the creation of drainage areas outside the E; hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): F-project operator announced on October 17, 2016; Defendant:

B. Division of land and examination for purchase of remaining land - Division of land: The Plaintiff, B, each of which owned 1/6 shares, Plaintiff C, and D each of 1/3 shares, and the land of 17,752 square meters of G forest land (hereinafter collectively referred to as “land”) on November 24, 2016, is divided into land of 12,859 square meters of G forest land, 179 square meters of H forest, 534 square meters of land, 534 square meters of J forest, 4,180 square meters of J forest, and 4,180 square meters of land (see attached Form 1) - Results of the examination for purchase of remaining land: The Plaintiff’s claim for purchase of each land of 12,859 square meters of G forest and forest (hereinafter referred to as “1 remaining land”), and 534 square meters of I forest and forest (hereinafter referred to as “2 remaining land”) on June 15, 2017.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on September 7, 2017 (hereinafter “instant ruling of expropriation”) - Each land of H forest land of 179 square meters and J forest of 4,180 square meters (hereinafter collectively “land to be expropriated”) - The date of commencement of expropriation: the date of expropriation: K Appraisal Corporation’s Gyeonggi branch office, K Appraisal Corporation L Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Appraisal of Expropriation”) (hereinafter “Appraisal of Expropriation”) - The plaintiffs’ claim for the purchase of land of H forest of 179 square meters and J forest of 4,180 square meters and each land of J forest of 200 square meters: October 31, 2017

D. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) on March 22, 2018 - The content of the ruling: 24,245,50 square meters for each of H 179 square meters for H 179 square meters for H 179 square meters (unit price of 135,450 square meters / square meters), and 53,995,000 square meters for J 4,180 square meters for J 180 square meters (unit price of 127,750 square meters/ square meters), respectively. - An appraisal corporation M Appraisal Corporation and N Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Objection Appraisal”) - The Plaintiffs’ purchase of remaining land and claim for compensation for depreciation of value should be again dismissed.

(e) The appraisal result does not exceed that of appraiserO.