Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-A-hurd motor vehicle.

On June 26, 2015, around 12:10 on July 26, 2015, the Defendant promoted the private distance in front of Tri-ri-ri An apartment apartment Yon-si, Tri-ri-ri-ri, from a non-school apartment room to a site shooting distance, in two-lanes depending on one-lanes.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to drive safely according to the signals displayed by traffic safety facilities.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the right side side of the car operated by the victim D (Woo 34 years old) who was directly driven by the Defendant in accordance with the new code on the left side of the bend, by negligence in contravention of the signal, even though he was in front-round red signal, from the front side of the car driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, a signal cycle mark, and a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (amended by Act No. 334 of the Criminal Procedure Act) is sufficiently known that the Defendant violated the signal given by CCTV images and signal cycle, and the Defendant appears to have denied the crime by failing to violate the signal signal given by the police officer (a favorable circumstance) (a favorable circumstance). The Defendant was only one time prior to the Defendant’s fine for a different kind of fine; the Defendant was injured by the instant accident; the Defendant suffered injury by the instant accident; the Defendant’s mistake and rebuttal; and the Defendant’s damage was presumed to have been considerably recovered through insurance.