1. The inherited property concluded around December 201 with respect to 2/15 shares of each real estate listed in the separate sheet between the defendant and B.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 30, 2002, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the guarantee of damages arising from the occupational misconduct, etc. of B, which is its employee, with the securities company, on March 30, 2002, and the Plaintiff, which caused property damage to the securities company, on June 16, 2004, paid 7 million won in accordance with the above contract for the guarantee of property damage to the securities company, and thereafter, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit (Seoul Central District Court 2004Da200610) seeking the payment of the indemnity against B (Seoul Central District Court 2004Da200610) with the above court, and on November 15, 2004, “B, from June 17, 2004 to November 19, 2004, 204, it was determined that the Plaintiff received 7 million won and its amount from the next day to 204% of the annual payment from the next day to the date of repayment.”

3) As of February 5, 2016, the sum of the principal and interest of the indemnity amount the Plaintiff had with respect to B is KRW 10,869,538. (b) B and the Defendant died on December 19, 2003, and C, the father of B and the Defendant, died on December 19, 2003. The heir had the Defendant, children, B, D, E, F, G, and H, the heir, who was the wife, and the heir was on December 2, 2011, and the heir was on inheritance by the Defendant: Seosan-si, the inherited property, Seosan-si, 1348 square meters, J-si, 2041 square meters, 3164 square meters, 1050 square meters, L, 1050 square meters, 913 square meters, 1489 square meters, 849 square meters, 849 square meters, and 3492 square meters prior to the date of inheritance.

2) On February 8, 2012, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on inheritance by consultation and division on December 19, 2003 with respect to the said real estate on February 8, 2012. (c) At the time of consultation on the division of inherited property, B’s property status was in excess of obligations, such as having not any property other than the inheritance shares in respect of inherited property as positive property at the time of consultation on the division of inherited property, having not any property, and having any obligation to reimburse the Plaintiff. D. As to the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached list of disposal of certain real estate, sales in