logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.05.01 2014가단33959
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. The Defendants jointly pay KRW 50,000,000 to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 3, 2011, Defendant B purchased No. 401 of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant real estate”), which was owned by D, and concluded a lease agreement with D, stipulating that the said real estate shall be leased to D by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 150,000,000, and the lease term of KRW 150,000,000, out of the purchase price to be paid by Defendant B to D, was agreed to substitute for the said lease deposit.

On April 4, 2011, Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to one half of the above real estate on April 4, 201.

B. The Plaintiff, as a her mother, G, and H, resided in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu 201, with his wife, was decided to jointly lease the instant real estate from Defendant B and F on April 4, 2012, upon the recommendation of the Plaintiff, G, and H, but upon the recommendation of the J, the Plaintiff’s right-hand side of the said real estate was determined from May 6, 2012 to May 6, 2014 and leased the lease deposit amount to KRW 50,00,000, KRW 00, KRW 00, and KRW 00, KRW 500, KRW 00, and the term of lease was set at KRW 50,000 from May 6, 2012 to May 6, 2014; and the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff paid KRW 50,000, KRW 50,000, KRW 50,000, KRW 50,000, KRW 505,205,205.

Accordingly, Defendant B and F prepared and issued each receipt for KRW 50,000,000 each of the lease deposits in the future of the Plaintiff, G and H.

Meanwhile, the lease deposit with respect to the above E-Ba 201 residing before the plaintiff, G and H was recovered by D.

C. The Plaintiff’s instant real estate from D.

arrow