The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant in the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court, based on its stated reasoning, sentenced the Defendant to the above-mentioned sentence on grounds of sentencing.

Although there are no circumstances that can be considered in light of the circumstances cited by the Defendant in the grounds of appeal, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment by fully considering these circumstances, and there are no changes in circumstances that may be considered newly in the sentencing after the lower judgment was sentenced.

In addition, even if examining the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's environment, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too excessive and unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Provided, That since it is evident that the decision of the court below on the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act among the application of the law of the court below was omitted, it is obvious that the decision of the court below on the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act was omitted. Thus, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant's appeal of this case is corrected by adding "the violation of the Ordinance of the court below's revocation column of the official