The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: although the court below determined the victim of this case as E; however, N, the owner of the building of this case, terminated a lease contract with E with respect to D located within the building of this case; and N or I, upon entering into a new lease contract with E, had N or I take charge of the above-mentioned services, the victim of this case should be N or I.

On March 3, 2015, the Defendant was subject to a sudden dismissal from Co., Ltd. E on March 3, 2015, and thereafter, the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission made an application for remedy against unfair dismissal and agreed to terminate the labor relationship with the resignation of the recommendation.

On March 3, 2015, at the time of the instant case, around March 3, 2015, the Defendant was obligated to take over the business since the termination of the employment relationship with E Co., Ltd.

Therefore, the defendant refused to take over the business.

of the damaged person's insolvency or business management;

subsection (b) of this section.

The defendant merely did not inform the overall operating method of the distribution, and it was merely a mere fact that the defendant refused to take over the business and thereby obstructed the victim's business by refusing to take over the business, and therefore, the defendant was merely not able to bring an action against the outside signboard. Therefore, the defendant did not interfere with the victim's business

Before the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant's ex officio, the prosecutor is a person working for the head of the agency and the manager who manages facilities, boilers, electricity, etc. in Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu Underground D, as the head of the agency and the public prosecutor.

In around 18:00 on March 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) “The Defendant was operated by the Victim E Co., Ltd. located under Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, for the reason that the Victim E Co., Ltd. was unfairly dismissed while accepting D; and (b) “The Defendant was operated by the Victim E Co., Ltd.

D The chief executive officer or manager who manages facilities, boilers, electricity, etc. has been employed.