beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who operated B city Council members from around 1991 to around 2010, D’s c city interest from around 2010 to around 2014, and F in racing from around 1993 to around 2014.
around October 2013, the Defendant, along with D, stated to the effect that “the Defendant would repay money to the victim G who became aware of in the course of the introduction of the said D with D, if it were to use the said money for a difficult situation. F may receive KRW 200 million from H of each month, and thus, receive KRW 200 million from the victim,” and the Defendant loaned KRW 60 million from the victim, around 23th day of the same month and around 25th day of the same month, and repaid the money on or around February 17, 2013, from that time until February 17, 2014, the Defendant continued to lend KRW 560,00 won in total from the victim one and four times a month from the victim until February 17, 2014.
However, the Defendant had been liable for the personal debt amounting to 4 billion won at the time. However, the above F was scheduled to seize the service charges to be paid from H, the only transaction entity, which was the only transaction entity, due to the non-payment of the additional tax and global income tax from the first half of the year of the first half of the year of the year of the year of the first half of the year of the year of the year of the year of the tax office. The above 5.6 million won loan from the above victim also was used as the employee's wages, and the victim was paid the payment from H, and then it was used as the means of the so-called return that was used as the employee's wages, and there was almost no other intention or ability to pay it at that time.
Nevertheless, around February 17, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “if the Defendant re-loans money, by April 15, 2014, it would have to be repaid to the victim by not later than April 15, 2014,” while repaying KRW 160,000 to the victim from the above F Office around January 15, 2014.”